Ratings & Policy

Find where a product credential earns points or counts, and what each rating tool or policy accepts.

Pick any rating tools or policies and any credentials. The results narrow to what you pick.

2 credentials, in Australian Government ESP Policy and EnviroDevelopment v4. Clear selection

CDPH Standard Method

Where it earns points or counts, rating tool by rating tool. About CDPH Standard Method

Credit names, credential names and conditions are in each rating tool's or policy's own words, shown where its publisher's terms allow.

None of the rating tools or policies selected names CDPH Standard Method. That is not a statement that none accepts it.

Read CDPH Standard Method’s requirements →

Product Carbon Footprint

Where it earns points or counts, rating tool by rating tool. About Product Carbon Footprint

Credit names, credential names and conditions are in each rating tool's or policy's own words, shown where its publisher's terms allow.

Australian Government ESP PolicyProcurement policy

  • Evaluation guidance – Products, 'Evidence of product sustainability' and 'Product Carbon Footprint'

    Status
    Accepted with conditions
    Named as
    Product Carbon Footprint
    Edition named
    ISO 14067
    On what basis
    listed as a way to verify sustainability
    Products
    FFE, ICT Goods, Textiles
    Scope
    Not named as gold standard (p. 5). The tool says a product with an EPD would be preferable (p. 6).
    Conditions
    • “verified” (the ESP Policy’s word) by a third party
    • measured to ISO 14067
    • product footprint, not organisational footprint (not ISO 14064-1)
    Source
    Australian Government ESP Policy · p. 5, 6, 16

Not named by: EnviroDevelopment v4.

Read Product Carbon Footprint’s requirements →